We'll restrict ourselves to small bugs, like nats, nothing really mobile like house flies. We have an observed bug impact rate of 2 bug/hour. I'd estimate that my ear is ~1"x2", an area of 2 in^2. Let's convert to metric, that's about 13 cm^2. Next I need to know how fast the wind was blowing. I'd guess about 15 miles per hour, it was a good stiff wind off the lake. From here, we just need to write down an equation for the bug collision rate. The simplest theory I can imagine would go something like this:

(Bug density)(ear cross section)(wind speed)=(collision rate)

In the above I've assumed that the bugs are moving with the wind (hence my initial assumption that the bugs are small, and thus will more or less move with the wind). If you check the above, it has the right units, bugs per time on both sides of the equation. Now we just need to solve for the bug density, we'll call that

*B*, in terms of the rest of our knowns: ear cross section area

*A*, wind speed

*v*, and collision rate

*R*. This gives

\[B=\frac{R}{Av}=\frac{2 bug/hour}{(13cm^2)(15mph)}\]

We've got a big of a units problem with our wind speed in miles per hour and our ear area in cm^2, so I'll convert from mph to cm/hour, and come out with a bug density of

\[B=\frac{2 bug/hour}{(13cm^2)(2.4 Mcm/hour)}=6.4*10^{-8}bugs/cm^3\]

That seems like an absurdly small number. Let's convert from cm^3 to m^3. That gives us .064 bugs/m^3. This still seems rather low to me. Put another way, we'd need ~16 m^3 to find 1 bug (this is only ~160 bugs/olympic swimming pool!). What might be amiss with the estimate? Well, I'm fairly happy with the ear area. I could be misremembering the length of my walk. More importantly, I'd wager that not all of my walk was perpendicular to the direction the wind was blowing. If I were at an angle to the wind I'd have a commensurately smaller ear surface area presented to the wind. Of course, this will at best probably gain us around a factor of two. I'm not very familiar with wind speeds, so maybe we could pick up another factor of two there.

Still, I imagine that the main problem with my calculation is that I assumed that all of the bugs were stationary and would be blown against my ear. Even little bugs are very mobile (as you well know if you've ever tried to swat them), and were probably actively trying to avoid my ear for the most part. Only the really weak, senseless (literally), or stupid bugs got blown against my ear, and apparently those aren't that common. How common are they? You tell me. Make an estimate for the bug density of air, compare it to my senseless bug density, and find the percent of bugs that fit my description! Or not, if you only come here to watch the rest of us toil over our calculations.

This reminded me of a fun fact I got at an ecology of infectious disease conference recently - there are about 10^8 virus particles / mL of ocean water near the coast. Just a factor of 10^16 over the bugs..

ReplyDeleteThis reminded me of this:

ReplyDeletehttp://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128389587

I'd guess that there would be a BIG correction to the calculation due to the nature of the airflow looks like around your body.

ReplyDeleteIt's hard to describe without a diagram, but in general the wind velocity lines don't go through your body, they go around your body. At the surface of your ear, the normal component of the wind velocity vector should be zero (unless you're more porous than most).

Very small bugs (small means bigger surface area to volume, so mass and inertia will play a minor role compared to wind drag) will more likely be swept around your body with the air flow than collide with your surface.

Correcting for this (i.e. the velocity component normal to your ear near the surface your ear is much lower than 15 mph) will likely change your answer by quite a bit.

I do love me some cross-section calculations, but fluid mechanics is tricky stuff.

Indeed it is. This was the very simplest calculation I could imagine, since I know almost nothing about fluid mechanics.

ReplyDelete